A Chon Buri school student has reportedly been banned from attending historical past lessons, because of political views that battle with those of the instructor. The matter was brought to the office of the district’s main schooling space by Yodchai Pungporn, a distant MP together with the child’s mom, who expressed concern over the influence this may need on the child’s academic progress.
A secondary school scholar found himself forbidden to attend historical past courses after expressing a political viewpoint that clashed with the teacher’s. The mother deems the instructor’s actions as inappropriate, and quite possibly a violation of human rights, tantamount to bullying young residents. The class ban additionally places the academic future of the scholar at stake, probably leading to a failure in the subject.
The concerned mother had initially lodged a grievance in July, following which the MP facilitated a meeting between the college principal and the student’s mother or father. The purpose was to request the principal’s intervention to resolve the issue. However, despite makes an attempt to rectify the situation, no substantial progress has been made, indicating the teacher’s apparent lack of concern over the warning imparted by the management.
As the mom associated additional, the disagreement stemmed from a contrast in political party preferences between the instructor and the scholar. Differences in opinion should naturally fall in the realm of personal respect, with no get together imposing concepts on the other.
Yet, the aftermath of this debate has been so extreme that the coed is now denied classroom schooling. His pissed off mom complained about the classroom banishing and its repercussions.
“The last meeting with the teacher, my complete intention was to have my son return to learning similar to his peers. But, if he had been unable to attend college, how would he clear the subject? And, what could be the implication on his class advancement?
“Sadly, our discussion that day had no fruitful end result, fairly the contrary, it escalated matters on either side; notably, the teacher continued to behave unfairly toward my son. Recognized , after my son has asked for forgiveness, the state of affairs stayed the identical. The trainer still refused to appropriate his errors and continued to exclude my son from learning the subject.”